Free Web Hosting Provider - Web Hosting - E-commerce - High Speed Internet - Free Web Page
Search the Web

From: mclaren

Subject: Wilson CPS scales - post 2 of 9 

The list of possible Wilson CPS scales in the prior post was incomplete because our assumption was that all generators were mutually prime. This need not be so. In fact, there are many advantages to using generators some of which are factors of other generators.

Erv Wilson himself prefers such CPS scales. Using degenerate sets of generators (i.e., sets of numbers some of which are multiples of others) simplifies the relationships between some of the notes and cuts down on the total number of tones in the scale by forcing some of the pitches to overlap one another in ratio space.

As it turns out, for highly degenerate sets of generators the Wilson CPS procedure generates numbers of tones previously thought unobtainable.

It was long thought, for instance, that a 17-tone Wilson CPS scale was impossible without throwing tones away or adding them promiscuously (or using the trivial dodge of taking 16 out of 17 generators).

However, the 3 out of 13 Wilson CPS [1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13] produces only 17 tones as its output. This is an almost completely degenerate set, since virtually all of the generators are multiples of one another: only 7, 11 and 13 are relatively prime to all the other generators. Every other generator is a factor of some other generator.

Consequently, the range of possible tones in a full Wilson CPS is much larger than previously suspected. Intermediate and supposedly unobtainable numbers of tones (17, 19, 22, 27, 30, 69, etc.) can be produced in a full Wilson CPS scale without adding or subtracting tones, simply by using highly degenerate sets as generators.

Example:

Wilson CPS of 10 generators taken 5 at a time: 5 out of [1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10] This is a highly redundant scale because 2 is a factor of 4, 3 is a factor of 6 and 9, 4 is a factor of 8 and 5 is a factor of 10. The result is a much smaller gamut than the theoretical maximum of 252 pitches:
SCALE RATIO CENTS FROM 1/1
DEGREE
0: 1/1 00.00000
1: 525/512 43.40835
2: 135/128 92.17876
3: 35/32 155.1396
4: 567/512 176.6459
5: 9/8 203.9100
6: 4725/4096 247.3184
7: 75/64 274.5825
8: 315/256 359.0498
9: 5/4 386.3139
10: 81/64 407.8201
11: 21/16 470.7811
12: 675/512 478.4926
13: 175/128 541.4535
14: 2835/2048 562.9598
15: 45/32 590.2239
16: 189/128 674.6912
17: 3/2 701.9553
18: 1575/1024 745.3637
19: 25/16 772.6278
20: 405/256 794.1340
21: 105/64 857.0950
22: 27/16 905.8654
23: 7/4 968.8264
24: 225/128 976.5379
25: 945/512 1061.005
26: 15/8 1088.269
27: 63/32 1172.736
28: 2025/1024 1180.447
Wilson CPS 2,12 [1,2,3,4,5,6,8,9,10,12,14,15]:
0: 1/1 00.00000
1: 135/128 92.17876a
2: 35/32 155.1396
3: 9/8 203.9100
4: 75/64 274.5825
5: 5/4 386.3139
6: 21/16 470.7811
7: 45/32 590.2239
8: 3/2 701.9553
9: 25/16 772.6278
10: 105/64 857.0950
11: 27/16 905.8654
12: 7/4 968.8264
13: 15/8 1088.269
14: 63/32 1172.736
Can we construct 16-pitch Wilson CPS scales using generators which are mostly factors of one another?

Yes, easily:

Wilson CPS 3,9 [1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9] -- a 16-note CPS. Only a few of the 84 theoretically possible pitches occur because most of the generators are factors of one another.
0: 1/1 00.00000
1: 135/128 92.17876
2: 35/32 155.1396
3: 9/8 203.9100
4: 315/256 359.0498
5: 5/4 386.3139
6: 81/64 407.8201
7: 21/16 470.7811
8: 45/32 590.2239
9: 189/128 674.6912
10: 3/2 701.9553
11: 105/64 857.0950
12: 27/16 905.8654
13: 7/4 968.8264
14: 15/8 1088.269
15: 63/32 1172.736
Here's another 16-note CPS. This one comes from 3,9 [1,2,3,4,5,6,8,9,11]:
0: 1/1
1: 32.32
2: 135/128
3: 9/8
4: 297/256
5: 5/4
6: 81/64
7: 165/128
8: 11/8
9: 45/32
10: 3/2
11: 99/64
12: 27/16
13: 55/32
14: 15/8
15: 495/256
Here's a 4-out-of-11 CPS with a surprising number of pitches.
Wilson CPS 4,11 [1,2,3,4,5,6,8,9,10,12,14]:
0: 1/1 00.00000
1: 525/512 43.40835
2: 135/128 92.17876
3: 35/32 155.1396
4: 567/512 176.6459
5: 9/8 203.9100
6: 75/64 274.5825
7: 315/256 359.0498
8: 5/4 386.3139
9: 81/64 407.8201
10: 21/16 470.7811
11: 675/512 478.4926
12: 175/128 541.4535
13: 45/32 590.2239
14: 189/128 674.6912
15: 3/2 701.9553
16: 1575/1024 745.3637
17: 25/16 772.6278
18: 405/256 794.1340
19: 105/64 857.0950
20: 27/16 905.8654
21: 7/4 968.8264
22: 225/128 976.5379
23: 945/512 1061.005
24: 15/8 1088.269
25: 243/128 1109.775
26: 63/32 1172.736
So far, we've seen only the inky-dinky little tiny CPSs. Next post, a listing of some robust CPSs with > 100 pitches.

--mclaren 


Top of this article
Index of Articles
Previous Article
Next Article